Sunshine State Conference · 2026 season
Tampa
14–1
Overall
6–0
SSC
.271
Hitting % · 18th in D2
.139
Opponents hit · 35th in D2
3
AVCA poll · Oct 5
25
Power rank of 281
NCAA tournament chance
Projected South seed 2.6
Projected South seed 2.6
Next · Fri, Oct 9, 6:00 PM CT
vs. Florida Tech 4–10
How they play
Ranked against all 281 Division II teams, with the Lone Star rank alongside. The bar shows how much of the field they're better than; the tick marks the median.
What they do well
- Sideout %62.1% · 13th in D2
- Hitting %.271 · 18th in D2
- Kills per set13.47 · 35th in D2
- Point-scoring %48.7% · 35th in D2
Where they can be pushed
- Service errors per set2.75 · 262nd in D2
Players
Full season. Ranks show the national top 100. Ranked players have played 75% of their team's sets (hitting % also needs 3 attempts per team set).
| 1 | Kayla Dondero | S | 46 | 1 | 9 | 0.02 | .000 | 5.35 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.78 | 0.39 |
| 2 | Connor Rahn | OH | 48 | 151 | 395 | 3.15 | .251 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.31 | 2.13 | 3.44 |
| 3 | Ana Rivera | L/DS | 53 | 1 | 5 | 0.02 | .200 | 1.00 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 4.17 | 0.21 |
| 4 | Camden Rahn | OH | 52 | 110 | 302 | 2.12 | .202 | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.77 | 0.92 | 2.78 |
| 5 | Ari Lopez | S | 25 | 4 | 10 | 0.16 | .400 | 2.52 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 1.08 | 0.44 |
| 6 | Katelynn Lowery | OH | 38 | 49 | 143 | 1.29 | .175 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.39 | 1.39 |
| 7 | Maddie Sofarelli | MB | 32 | 52 | 90 | 1.63 | .456 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.56 | 0.09 | 2.00 |
| 9 | Ainhoa Molleja | OH | 49 | 145 | 378 | 2.96 | .225 | 0.10 | 0.39 | 0.22 | 2.39 | 3.46 |
| 12 | Zoe Richardson | L/DS | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.34 | 0.10 |
| 13 | Olivia Guzman | MB | 40 | 39 | 122 | 0.97 | .148 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.23 | 1.23 |
| 14 | Logan Milan | L/DS | 37 | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | .000 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.19 |
| 16 | Laney Perdue | OH | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.79 | 0.07 |
| 17 | Jenna Glaudel | S | 49 | 13 | 25 | 0.27 | .440 | 5.00 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 1.73 | 0.55 |
| 18 | Julianna Baskin | MB | 28 | 41 | 67 | 1.46 | .567 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.79 | 0.14 | 2.09 |
| 26 | Ryan Connelly | MB | 27 | 16 | 28 | 0.59 | .500 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.07 | 0.91 |
| 33 | Mak Carter | MB | 44 | 92 | 161 | 2.09 | .4534th D2 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.89 | 0.73 | 2.80 |
Pressure and runs
Full season. Built from NCAA play-by-play.
Late in sets (20–20 or later)
- Rallies won66.9% of 139
- Sideout %90.9% · all rallies 62.1%
- Point-scoring %51.8% · all rallies 48.7%
- Late kills–errorsMolleja 14–1 · Rahn 13–3 · Rahn 9–0 · Carter 6–0 · Sofarelli 3–0 · Guzman 2–1
Runs and comebacks
- Longest run11 straight · 25–2 in set 2 vs. Molloy 08/29
- Longest run against8 straight · 21–25 in set 3 vs. Spring Hill 09/11
- Sets with a 5-point run25 for · 11 against · of 53
- Comeback setsdown 9, won 28–26 in set 4 vs. Saint Leo 09/29
down 8, won 26–24 in set 1 vs. Okla. Baptist 09/04
down 6, won 30–28 in set 1 vs. West Florida 09/12 - Leads lostNone from 5+ up
Tampa news
- Volleyball Preview: No. 3 Tampa Takes on Florida Tech and No. 9 BarryOct 7
- Dondero Records 1,000th Career Assist in Spartans WinOct 2
- Volleyball Picks Up Road Win Over Saint LeoSep 28
- Volleyball Preview: No. 3 Tampa Hits the Road Again For League PlaySep 28
- Spartans Dominate Eagles in Sweep at The BobSep 25
Headlines from Tampa athletics. All D2 news ›
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Opp. record | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fri, Aug 28 | at | 10–9 | W 3–0 25-14, 25-22, 25-12 |
| Fri, Aug 28 | vs. | 16–1 | L 2–3 17-25, 17-25, 25-19, 25-19, 11-15 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | at | 4–15 | W 3–0 25-16, 25-20, 25-14 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | at | 6–9 | W 3–0 25-14, 25-2, 25-21 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | vs. | 13–5 | W 3–0 25-14, 25-16, 25-22 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | vs. | 15–4 | W 3–0 26-24, 25-19, 25-14 |
| Sat, Sep 5 | vs. | 11–5 | W 3–1 25-18, 21-25, 25-16, 25-11 |
| Fri, Sep 11 | vs. | 14–7 | W 3–1 25-16, 25-23, 21-25, 25-10 |
| Sat, Sep 12 | at | 3–1 | W 3–1 30-28, 25-21, 13-25, 25-21 |
| Fri, Sep 18 | at | 11–7 | W 3–1 8-25, 25-22, 25-18, 25-22 |
| Sat, Sep 19 | at | 8–6 | W 3–1 12-25, 27-25, 25-13, 25-15 |
| Fri, Sep 25 | vs. | 9–8 | W 3–0 25-21, 25-15, 25-20 |
| Sat, Sep 26 | vs. | 10–5 | W 3–0 25-15, 25-20, 26-24 |
| Tue, Sep 29 | at | 5–12 | W 3–1 25-20, 25-20, 14-25, 28-26 |
| Sat, Oct 3 | at | 9–9 | W 3–0 25-19, 25-20, 33-31 |
| Fri, Oct 9 | vs. | 4–10 | Oct 9, 6:00 PM CT 95% |
| Sat, Oct 10 | vs. | 11–2 | Oct 10, 3:00 PM CT 45% |
| Tue, Oct 13 | vs. | 8–6 | Oct 13, 6:00 PM CT 80% |
| Fri, Oct 16 | vs. | 9–9 | Oct 16, 6:00 PM CT 89% |
| Sat, Oct 17 | vs. | 15–2 | Oct 17, 3:00 PM CT 42% |
| Fri, Oct 23 | at | 10–5 | Oct 23, 5:00 PM CT 62% |
| Sat, Oct 24 | at | 9–8 | Oct 24, 3:00 PM CT 83% |
| Tue, Oct 27 | vs. | 5–12 | Oct 27, 6:00 PM CT 98% |
| Fri, Oct 30 | vs. | 9–9 | Oct 30, 6:00 PM CT 85% |
| Fri, Nov 6 | at | 11–2 | Nov 6, 6:00 PM CT 34% |
| Sat, Nov 7 | at | 4–10 | Nov 7, 3:00 PM CT 91% |
| Tue, Nov 10 | vs. | 11–7 | Nov 10, 6:00 PM CT 74% |
| Fri, Nov 13 | at | 15–2 | Nov 13, 6:00 PM CT 31% |
| Sat, Nov 14 | at | 9–9 | Nov 14, 3:00 PM CT 82% |