California Collegiate Athletic Association · 2026 season
Cal St. East Bay
6–8
Overall
5–3
CCAA
.195
Hitting % · 119th in D2
.199
Opponents hit · 186th in D2
54
Power rank of 281
NCAA tournament chance
Projected West seed 8.0
Projected West seed 8.0
Next · Fri, Oct 9, 9:00 PM CT
at Fresno Pacific 15–0
How they play
Ranked against all 281 Division II teams, with the Lone Star rank alongside. The bar shows how much of the field they're better than; the tick marks the median.
What they do well
- Reception error %6.2% · 26th in D2
- Blocks per set2.05 · 52nd in D2
- Aces per set2.00 · 53rd in D2
- Digs per set16.24 · 69th in D2
Where they can be pushed
- Point-scoring %43.3% · 188th in D2
- Opponent hitting %.199 · 186th in D2
Players
Full season. Ranks show the national top 100. Ranked players have played 75% of their team's sets (hitting % also needs 3 attempts per team set).
| 1 | Rebeca Freitas | L/DS | 41 | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | .000 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Gianna Navarro | OH | 52 | 93 | 273 | 1.79 | .209 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.42 | 1.17 | 2.24 |
| 3 | Saniya Kimbrough | OH | 31 | 24 | 73 | 0.77 | .110 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.82 |
| 4 | Kale'a Kuamo'o | L/DS | 55 | 0 | 14 | 0.00 | -.071 | 0.71 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 4.2993rd D2 | 0.27 |
| 5 | Carys Fouser | MB | 47 | 37 | 102 | 0.79 | .235 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 1.1326th D2 | 0.26 | 1.47 |
| 6 | Jaslyn Wallace | S | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | Trinity Cox | S | 37 | 1 | 1 | 0.03 | 1.000 | 0.46 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.43 | 0.27 |
| 8 | Barakat Adekola | OH | 53 | 145 | 491 | 2.74 | .193 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 3.13 | 3.22 |
| 9 | Sydnee Macias | OH | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 10 | Megan Merrill | S | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 11 | Brooklynne Traficante | MB | 22 | 14 | 23 | 0.64 | .565 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.73 |
| 12 | Lamona Lauhingoa | OH | 50 | 170 | 484 | 3.4066th D2 | .163 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.36 | 2.12 | 3.8770th D2 |
| 13 | Makaiya Gerhardt | OH | 30 | 37 | 121 | 1.23 | .174 | 0.03 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.77 | 1.55 |
| 14 | Faith Stambaugh | MB | 29 | 12 | 35 | 0.41 | .143 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.67 |
| 15 | Pi'ilani Carvalho | S | 55 | 30 | 91 | 0.55 | .264 | 9.0251st D2 | 0.4761st D2 | 0.40 | 3.00 | 1.24 |
| 16 | Makena Sacks | OH | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 17 | Natali Herrera | MB | 41 | 66 | 159 | 1.61 | .314 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.46 | 1.95 |
| 18 | Malayah Adams | OH | 29 | 21 | 77 | 0.72 | .065 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.93 |
| 19 | Lauren Au | L/DS | 54 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | -1.000 | 0.02 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.28 |
| 20 | Gabrielle Casino | L/DS | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 21 | Isabelle Watson | OH | 12 | 18 | 40 | 1.50 | .200 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 1.58 |
Pressure and runs
Full season. Built from NCAA play-by-play.
Late in sets (20–20 or later)
- Rallies won48.4% of 182
- Sideout %53.4% · all rallies 57.5%
- Point-scoring %43.6% · all rallies 43.3%
- Late kills–errorsLauhingoa 10–5 · Gerhardt 6–1 · Adekola 12–8 · Herrera 4–0 · Navarro 5–1 · Carvalho 3–0 · Watson 3–2 · Adams 2–2
Runs and comebacks
- Longest run9 straight · 25–10 in set 2 vs. Stanislaus St. 09/26
- Longest run against10 straight · 6–15 in set 5 vs. Stanislaus St. 09/26
- Sets with a 5-point run19 for · 18 against · of 55
- Comeback setsdown 6, won 27–25 in set 1 vs. Cal State LA 09/18
down 6, won 25–23 in set 4 vs. Stanislaus St. 09/26 - Leads lostup 8, lost 24–26 in set 2 vs. Cal State LA 09/18
up 6, lost 23–25 in set 1 vs. San Fran. St. 09/25
up 5, lost 21–25 in set 1 vs. Minn. Duluth 08/28
Cal St. East Bay news
- Cal State East Bay’s Kale'a Kuamo'o named FloCollege/CCAA Volleyball Defensive Player of the WeekOct 6
- Pioneers Sweep Stanislaus State for Second Straight WinOct 3
- Pioneers Take Down Chico State in Four SetsOct 3
- Pioneers Battle to Five Sets Against Stanislaus StateSep 26
- Pioneers Rally Past San Francisco State in Four SetsSep 25
Headlines from Cal St. East Bay athletics. All D2 news ›
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Opp. record | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thu, Aug 27 | at | 12–5 | L 0–3 23-25, 23-25, 21-25 |
| Fri, Aug 28 | at | 16–1 | L 0–3 21-25, 18-25, 23-25 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | vs. | 9–7 | L 0–3 16-25, 23-25, 22-25 |
| Thu, Sep 3 | vs. | 8–8 | L 2–3 23-25, 25-20, 23-25, 25-19, 15-17 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | vs. | 13–3 | W 3–2 25-18, 17-25, 21-25, 25-23, 15-8 |
| Sat, Sep 5 | vs. | 6–9 | L 2–3 22-25, 25-21, 18-25, 25-19, 10-15 |
| Fri, Sep 11 | at | 7–8 | W 3–1 22-25, 25-21, 25-22, 25-23 |
| Sat, Sep 12 | at | 14–2 | L 0–3 20-25, 15-25, 21-25 |
| Fri, Sep 18 | vs. | 4–11 | W 3–1 27-25, 24-26, 25-16, 25-9 |
| Sat, Sep 19 | vs. | 12–3 | L 1–3 20-25, 25-21, 18-25, 24-26 |
| Fri, Sep 25 | vs. | 6–8 | W 3–1 23-25, 25-19, 25-17, 25-22 |
| Sat, Sep 26 | at | 5–9 | L 2–3 25-27, 25-10, 20-25, 25-23, 6-15 |
| Fri, Oct 2 | vs. | 4–7 | W 3–1 25-14, 25-22, 23-25, 25-16 |
| Sat, Oct 3 | vs. | 5–9 | W 3–0 25-23, 25-23, 25-19 |
| Fri, Oct 9 | at | 15–0 | Oct 9, 9:00 PM CT 11% |
| Sat, Oct 10 | at | 4–10 | Oct 10, 7:00 PM CT 90% |
| Sat, Oct 17 | vs. | 6–8 | Oct 17, 7:00 PM CT 57% |
| Fri, Oct 23 | vs. | 12–3 | Oct 23, 5:00 PM CT 31% |
| Thu, Oct 29 | vs. | 3–11 | Oct 29, 7:00 PM CT 89% |
| Sat, Oct 31 | vs. | 5–9 | Oct 31, 7:00 PM CT 82% |
| Thu, Nov 5 | at | 7–7 | Nov 5, 4:00 PM CT 76% |
| Sat, Nov 7 | at | 2–13 | Nov 7, 3:00 PM CT 95% |