California Collegiate Athletic Association · 2026 season
Cal St. Dom. Hills
2–13
Overall
2–6
CCAA
.119
Hitting % · 251st in D2
.264
Opponents hit · 275th in D2
194
Power rank of 281
NCAA tournament chance
Next · Sat, Oct 10, 3:00 PM CT
at Cal Poly Humboldt 7–7
How they play
Ranked against all 281 Division II teams, with the Lone Star rank alongside. The bar shows how much of the field they're better than; the tick marks the median.
What they do well
- Aces per set1.96 · 62nd in D2
Where they can be pushed
- Digs per set11.40 · 277th in D2
- Opponent hitting %.264 · 275th in D2
- Point-scoring %39.7% · 267th in D2
Players
Full season. Ranks show the national top 100. Ranked players have played 75% of their team's sets (hitting % also needs 3 attempts per team set).
| 1 | Giovannina De Sisto | S | 50 | 19 | 43 | 0.38 | .279 | 4.82 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 1.30 | 0.64 |
| 2 | Makena Morrison | L/DS | 30 | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | .000 | 0.37 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 0.13 |
| 3 | Jasmine Soto | L/DS | 46 | 1 | 11 | 0.02 | -.182 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 0.04 |
| 4 | Malia Jones | L/DS | 47 | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | -.167 | 0.66 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 2.09 | 0.21 |
| 5 | Keilyn Flores | S | 34 | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | .000 | 2.59 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 1.21 | 0.18 |
| 6 | Jaidan Alexander | OH | 44 | 80 | 261 | 1.82 | .138 | 0.11 | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.93 | 2.22 |
| 7 | Rilee Graham | OH | 37 | 50 | 176 | 1.35 | .080 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 0.03 | 0.78 | 1.61 |
| 8 | Jayla Yoder | S | 26 | 4 | 10 | 0.15 | .400 | 2.54 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.65 | 0.54 |
| 10 | Lainey Johnson | L/DS | 50 | 5 | 24 | 0.10 | .000 | 0.22 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 0.26 |
| 11 | Jaiden Pierson | OPP | 14 | 0 | 9 | 0.00 | -.444 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 0.14 |
| 12 | Dakota Carvo | OH | 45 | 88 | 258 | 1.96 | .143 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.73 | 2.26 |
| 13 | Kylie Leopard | MB | 47 | 49 | 149 | 1.04 | .134 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.74 | 0.38 | 1.63 |
| 15 | Jordan Kennedy | MB | 23 | 22 | 69 | 0.96 | .087 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.43 | 0.26 | 1.20 |
| 17 | Shyla Williams | OH | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 18 | Natalia Walden-Schulz | OPP | 48 | 58 | 217 | 1.21 | .028 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 1.43 |
| 20 | Anna Sanzaro | MB | 50 | 51 | 129 | 1.02 | .287 | 0.06 | 0.32 | 0.44 | 0.20 | 1.58 |
| 22 | Ryann Bennett | MB | 51 | 86 | 268 | 1.69 | .108 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.39 | 0.22 | 1.88 |
Pressure and runs
Full season. Built from NCAA play-by-play.
Late in sets (20–20 or later)
- Rallies won44.1% of 68
- Sideout %56.3% · all rallies 49.4%
- Point-scoring %33.3% · all rallies 39.7%
- Late kills–errorsAlexander 2–1 · Graham 2–2 · Leopard 3–3
Runs and comebacks
- Longest run8 straight · 25–12 in set 2 vs. UC Merced 09/25
- Longest run against12 straight · 7–25 in set 2 vs. CSUSB 10/03
- Sets with a 5-point run14 for · 24 against · of 53
- Comeback setsdown 5, won 25–23 in set 2 vs. Rockhurst 08/28
- Leads lostup 6, lost 19–25 in set 3 vs. Colo. Sch. of Mines 08/28
up 6, lost 24–26 in set 3 vs. Menlo 09/18
Cal St. Dom. Hills news
- No. 12 CS San Bernardino Rolls Past TorosOct 4
- Host Cougars Too Good for Toros in SweepOct 2
- No. 4 Fresno Pacific Makes Quick Work of Toros in SweepSep 26
- Toros Hit Season Best .324 in Four-Set Win Over UC MercedSep 25
- Toros No Match for Otters in CCAA TiltSep 19
Headlines from Cal St. Dom. Hills athletics. All D2 news ›
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Opp. record | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thu, Aug 27 | vs. | 6–8 | L 2–3 23-25, 25-19, 25-23, 22-25, 16-18 |
| Fri, Aug 28 | at | 13–3 | L 0–3 23-25, 21-25, 19-25 |
| Fri, Aug 28 | at | 11–5 | L 1–3 17-25, 25-23, 23-25, 20-25 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | at | 12–5 | L 0–3 17-25, 11-25, 8-25 |
| Thu, Sep 3 | at | 15–2 | L 0–3 17-25, 13-25, 19-25 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | vs. | 12–4 | L 0–3 12-25, 15-25, 19-25 |
| Sat, Sep 5 | at | 5–11 | L 1–3 23-25, 22-25, 25-21, 17-25 |
| Thu, Sep 10 | vs. | 4–7 | L 1–3 21-25, 15-25, 25-19, 16-25 |
| Sat, Sep 12 | vs. | 5–9 | W 3–2 14-25, 25-20, 21-25, 25-23, 15-10 |
| Fri, Sep 18 | at | 5–9 | L 0–3 20-25, 19-25, 24-26 |
| Sat, Sep 19 | at | 3–11 | L 0–3 22-25, 16-25, 20-25 |
| Fri, Sep 25 | vs. | 4–10 | W 3–1 25-12, 25-12, 24-26, 25-20 |
| Sat, Sep 26 | vs. | 15–0 | L 0–3 13-25, 13-25, 14-25 |
| Thu, Oct 1 | at | 7–8 | L 0–3 18-25, 17-25, 16-25 |
| Sat, Oct 3 | at | 14–2 | L 0–3 9-25, 7-25, 14-25 |
| Sat, Oct 10 | at | 7–7 | Oct 10, 3:00 PM CT 14% |
| Thu, Oct 15 | vs. | 15–0 | Oct 15, 7:00 PM CT 1% |
| Sat, Oct 17 | vs. | 4–10 | Oct 17, 7:00 PM CT 43% |
| Fri, Oct 23 | at | 3–11 | Oct 23, 7:00 PM CT 20% |
| Sat, Oct 24 | at | 5–9 | Oct 24, 9:00 PM CT 12% |
| Thu, Oct 29 | at | 12–3 | Oct 29, 7:00 PM CT 1% |
| Sat, Oct 31 | at | 4–11 | Oct 31, 4:00 PM CT 5% |
| Thu, Nov 5 | vs. | 6–8 | Nov 5, 7:00 PM CT 5% |
| Sat, Nov 7 | vs. | 6–8 | Nov 7, 3:00 PM CT 5% |