Matchup · Eckerd at Florida Tech · Sat, Oct 31, 3:00 PM CT
Already this season
| Date | Match | Eckerd result |
|---|---|---|
| Fri, Oct 2 | vs. Florida Tech | W 3–1 25-21, 25-22, 25-27, 25-19 |
Prediction
From the power rating, at Florida Tech. Eckerd is expected to win 53.3% of rallies.
80%
Eckerd wins · power rank 48
3–0 32%3–1 30%3–2 18%
20%
Florida Tech wins · power rank 137
3–0 3%3–1 7%3–2 10%
Where the match is won
Each team's strength set against the other's matching skill. Full season, ranked nationally.
Eckerd on offense
Eckerd attack vs. Florida Tech defense
Eckerd hitting %.214 · 86th
Florida Tech opp. hitting % allowed.220 · 239th
Edge: Eckerd
Eckerd serve vs. Florida Tech passing
Eckerd aces per set1.91 · 78th
Florida Tech reception error %10.9% · 244th
Edge: Eckerd
Eckerd siding out vs. Florida Tech serving
Eckerd sideout %58.2% · 66th
Florida Tech point-scoring %41.6% · 241st
Edge: Eckerd
Florida Tech on offense
Florida Tech attack vs. Eckerd defense
Florida Tech hitting %.173 · 172nd
Eckerd opp. hitting % allowed.137 · 30th
Edge: Eckerd
Florida Tech serve vs. Eckerd passing
Florida Tech aces per set1.38 · 237th
Eckerd reception error %6.0% · 17th
Edge: Eckerd
Florida Tech siding out vs. Eckerd serving
Florida Tech sideout %53.0% · 201st
Eckerd point-scoring %46.4% · 93rd
Edge: Eckerd
What each team does well
Eckerd
What they do well
- Reception error %6.0% · 17th in D2
- Opponent hitting %.137 · 30th in D2
- Blocks per set2.11 · 46th in D2
- Sideout %58.2% · 66th in D2
Where they can be pushed
- Service errors per set2.57 · 238th in D2
Florida Tech
What they do well
- Blocks per set2.22 · 32nd in D2
Where they can be pushed
- Reception error %10.9% · 244th in D2
- Point-scoring %41.6% · 241st in D2
- Opponent hitting %.220 · 239th in D2
Side by side
Full season, ranked nationally. The bar shows how much of the field each team is better than; the tick is the median.
EckerdFlorida Tech
Against good teams and late in sets
| Eckerd | Florida Tech | |
|---|---|---|
| Power rank | 48 | 137 |
| Schedule strength rank | 116 | 51 |
| Record vs. top 50 | 0–5 | 0–5 |
| Hitting % vs. top 50 | .181 | .124 |
| Opponents hit vs. top 50 | .215 | .285 |
| Rallies won at 20–20 or later | 42.4% 158 | 46.6% 116 |
Players to watch
Each team's leader in every category (regulars only: half of the team's sets). Full season, ranked nationally.
EckerdFlorida Tech
Kills per set
Seiler Hruska OH
3.39 · 207 kills · 67th in D2
Cordelia Kearns OH
4.04 · 218 kills · 17th in D2
Hitting %
Hayden Nash MB
.330 · 131–30–306 · 94th in D2
Scarlett Kimbrell MB
.296 · 75–16–199 · 172nd in D2
Assists per set
Grace Dumont S
8.86 · 567 assists · 60th in D2
Sophia Schneider L/DS
3.98 · 203 assists · 314th in D2
Aces per set
Seiler Hruska OH
0.43 · 26 aces · 103rd in D2
Natalie Rhodes S
0.46 · 25 aces · 67th in D2
Blocks per set
Peyton Walker MB
0.94 · 59 blocks · 111th in D2
Scarlett Kimbrell MB
1.26 · 68 blocks · 13th in D2
Digs per set
Sydney Williams DS
4.35 · 283 digs · 87th in D2
Brooke Menke L/DS
3.48 · 188 digs · 189th in D2
Points per set
Seiler Hruska OH
4.09 · 249.5 points · 43rd in D2
Cordelia Kearns OH
4.55 · 245.5 points · 17th in D2
Common opponents
| Opponent | Eckerd | Florida Tech |
|---|---|---|
| W 3–0 25-9, 25-18, 25-16 | L 1–3 25-15, 22-25, 23-25, 15-25 | |
| L 2–3 25-17, 23-25, 26-24, 11-25, 13-15 | L 0–3 23-25, 15-25, 10-25 | |
| W 3–0 25-22, 25-21, 25-21 | W 3–2 25-11, 25-20, 20-25, 20-25, 16-14 | |
| L 1–3 19-25, 22-25, 25-16, 13-25 | L 0–3 15-25, 22-25, 21-25 |
Eckerd roster
| 1 | Sydney Williams | L/DS | 65 | 1 | 8 | 0.02 | .125 | 0.74 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 4.3587th D2 | 0.23 |
| 2 | Kaitlyn Dohs | L/DS | 33 | 23 | 81 | 0.70 | .074 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 1.58 | 0.83 |
| 3 | Elayna Rickmon | L/DS | 34 | 1 | 2 | 0.03 | .500 | 0.03 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.56 | 0.18 |
| 4 | Hayden Nash | MB | 55 | 131 | 306 | 2.38 | .33094th D2 | 0.05 | 0.33 | 0.87 | 0.60 | 3.30 |
| 5 | Grace Dumont | S | 64 | 71 | 176 | 1.11 | .278 | 8.8660th D2 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 1.84 | 1.52 |
| 6 | Avry Nelson | MB | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0.20 | .000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 0.20 | 0.70 |
| 7 | Seiler Hruska | OH | 61 | 207 | 599 | 3.3967th D2 | .200 | 0.16 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 2.30 | 4.0943rd D2 |
| 8 | Brigit Walsh | OH | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 10 | Jaelynn Tunley | OH | 63 | 86 | 310 | 1.37 | .139 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 3.08 | 1.63 |
| 11 | Lilli Weber | S | 30 | 3 | 9 | 0.10 | .333 | 2.07 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.97 | 0.25 |
| 12 | Raegan Reeves | OH | 11 | 4 | 18 | 0.36 | .111 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.36 |
| 13 | Natalie Aniol | MB | 51 | 84 | 223 | 1.65 | .220 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.61 | 0.37 | 2.01 |
| 14 | Taylor Rice | OH | 19 | 10 | 35 | 0.53 | .171 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.26 | 0.58 |
| 15 | Maggie Turner | L/DS | 52 | 1 | 4 | 0.02 | -.250 | 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 1.56 | 0.23 |
| 20 | Grace Herzog | MB | 21 | 14 | 38 | 0.67 | .158 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 0.95 |
| 21 | Nyla Muskovin | OH | 15 | 8 | 22 | 0.53 | .227 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.60 |
| 23 | Addison Kerr | S | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 30 | Peyton Walker | MB | 63 | 96 | 238 | 1.52 | .277 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 0.21 | 2.13 |
| 32 | Jaiden Harris | OH | 42 | 74 | 214 | 1.76 | .150 | 0.07 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 1.45 | 2.21 |
| 99 | Sarah Webb | L/DS | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Florida Tech roster
| 1 | Sophia Schneider | L/DS | 51 | 4 | 30 | 0.08 | .033 | 3.98 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 1.53 | 0.10 |
| 2 | McCoy Phister | L/DS | 18 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | -.250 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.89 | 0.11 |
| 3 | Chiara Cristinzio | L/DS | 26 | 0 | 3 | 0.00 | .000 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.00 |
| 4 | Brooke Menke | L/DS | 54 | 0 | 15 | 0.00 | -.133 | 0.83 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 3.48 | 0.20 |
| 5 | Zeynep Turkurkor | MB | 13 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | .000 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.04 |
| 6 | Norah Hany | MB | 11 | 1 | 4 | 0.09 | .250 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.14 |
| 7 | Elisa Broggio | OH | 48 | 53 | 193 | 1.10 | .114 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.56 | 1.08 | 1.65 |
| 8 | Cordelia Kearns | OH | 54 | 218 | 593 | 4.0417th D2 | .214 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.59 | 2.52 | 4.5517th D2 |
| 9 | Alyson Dennison | OH | 19 | 0 | 3 | 0.00 | .000 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.05 |
| 10 | Ayisha Missipo | OH | 43 | 59 | 198 | 1.37 | .111 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.49 | 1.48 |
| 11 | Scarlett Kimbrell | MB | 54 | 75 | 199 | 1.39 | .296 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 1.2613th D2 | 0.30 | 2.16 |
| 12 | Isabelle Clark | MB | 54 | 93 | 252 | 1.72 | .214 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 2.41 |
| 13 | Tessa Schutter | OH | 21 | 10 | 46 | 0.48 | -.022 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.57 |
| 17 | Hanna Schneider | L/DS | 47 | 0 | 7 | 0.00 | -.143 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 1.87 | 0.13 |
| 18 | Olivia Bush | OH | 18 | 19 | 59 | 1.06 | .254 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.67 | 0.22 | 1.42 |
| 20 | Abby Koenen | OH | 43 | 31 | 123 | 0.72 | .081 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| 21 | Dora Filipovic | OH | 17 | 9 | 37 | 0.53 | .081 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.41 | 0.56 |
| 37 | Natalie Rhodes | S | 54 | 2 | 24 | 0.04 | .083 | 3.69 | 0.4667th D2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 0.50 |
Florida Tech schedule
| Date | Opponent | Opp. record | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fri, Aug 28 | at | 8–7 | W 3–0 25-14, 25-17, 25-15 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | vs. | 9–8 | L 1–3 20-25, 27-25, 22-25, 20-25 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | at | 15–1 | L 1–3 17-25, 20-25, 25-20, 17-25 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | vs. | 10–9 | W 3–2 25-22, 27-25, 16-25, 23-25, 15-10 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | at | 8–9 | L 1–3 22-25, 28-30, 25-18, 22-25 |
| Sat, Sep 5 | vs. | 10–7 | L 1–3 25-22, 18-25, 10-25, 19-25 |
| Sat, Sep 5 | at | 16–1 | L 0–3 12-25, 15-25, 17-25 |
| Fri, Sep 11 | at | 12–6 | L 1–3 20-25, 25-19, 16-25, 18-25 |
| Fri, Sep 18 | vs. | 9–9 | W 3–2 25-11, 25-20, 20-25, 20-25, 16-14 |
| Sat, Sep 19 | vs. | 15–2 | L 0–3 23-25, 15-25, 10-25 |
| Tue, Sep 22 | at | 11–2 | L 0–3 15-25, 22-25, 21-25 |
| Sat, Sep 26 | vs. | 9–9 | W 3–2 17-25, 16-25, 25-19, 25-22, 15-3 |
| Fri, Oct 2 | at | 11–7 | L 1–3 21-25, 22-25, 27-25, 19-25 |
| Sat, Oct 3 | at | 5–12 | L 1–3 25-15, 22-25, 23-25, 15-25 |
| Fri, Oct 9 | at | 14–1 | Oct 9, 6:00 PM CT 5% |
| Sat, Oct 10 | at | 8–6 | Oct 10, 3:00 PM CT 17% |
| Tue, Oct 13 | at | 15–2 | Oct 13, 6:00 PM CT 3% |
| Fri, Oct 16 | vs. | 9–8 | Oct 16, 6:00 PM CT 41% |
| Sat, Oct 17 | vs. | 10–5 | Oct 17, 3:00 PM CT 19% |
| Tue, Oct 20 | at | 16–2 | Oct 20, 5:00 PM CT 14% |
| Thu, Oct 22 | at | 9–9 | Oct 22, 5:00 PM CT 20% |
| Tue, Oct 27 | vs. | 11–2 | Oct 27, 6:00 PM CT 6% |
| Fri, Oct 30 | vs. | 5–12 | Oct 30, 6:00 PM CT 75% |
| Sat, Oct 31 | vs. | 11–7 | Oct 31, 3:00 PM CT 20% |
| Fri, Nov 6 | vs. | 8–6 | Nov 6, 6:00 PM CT 26% |
| Sat, Nov 7 | vs. | 14–1 | Nov 7, 3:00 PM CT 9% |
| Tue, Nov 10 | at | 9–9 | Nov 10, 6:00 PM CT 28% |
| Fri, Nov 13 | at | 10–5 | Nov 13, 5:00 PM CT 12% |
| Sat, Nov 14 | at | 9–8 | Nov 14, 3:00 PM CT 29% |
Want this as a game-day scouting report? See a sample ›
Eckerd schedule
| Date | Opponent | Opp. record | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fri, Aug 28 | vs. | 6–14 | W 3–0 25-20, 25-17, 25-14 |
| Fri, Aug 28 | vs. | 2–2 | L 2–3 19-25, 25-15, 25-22, 23-25, 14-16 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | vs. | 12–6 | L 1–3 26-28, 17-25, 25-19, 23-25 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | vs. | 11–8 | W 3–0 25-16, 25-22, 25-21 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | at | 12–5 | W 3–0 25-12, 25-17, 25-19 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | at | 7–9 | W 3–0 25-19, 25-19, 25-22 |
| Sat, Sep 5 | at | 4–12 | W 3–0 25-14, 25-11, 25-18 |
| Sat, Sep 5 | at | 14–3 | L 1–3 18-25, 25-22, 23-25, 18-25 |
| Fri, Sep 11 | vs. | 4–16 | W 3–0 25-17, 25-17, 25-19 |
| Fri, Sep 11 | at | 6–10 | W 3–0 25-20, 25-20, 25-16 |
| Sat, Sep 12 | vs. | 10–10 | W 3–1 26-24, 19-25, 25-12, 25-20 |
| Fri, Sep 18 | vs. | 14–1 | L 1–3 25-8, 22-25, 18-25, 22-25 |
| Sat, Sep 19 | at | 5–12 | W 3–0 25-9, 25-18, 25-16 |
| Fri, Sep 25 | at | 15–2 | L 2–3 25-17, 23-25, 26-24, 11-25, 13-15 |
| Sat, Sep 26 | at | 9–9 | W 3–0 25-22, 25-21, 25-21 |
| Tue, Sep 29 | vs. | 8–6 | L 1–3 22-25, 26-28, 25-18, 18-25 |
| Fri, Oct 2 | vs. | 4–10 | W 3–1 25-21, 25-22, 25-27, 25-19 |
| Sat, Oct 3 | vs. | 11–2 | L 1–3 19-25, 22-25, 25-16, 13-25 |
| Fri, Oct 9 | at | 9–8 | Oct 9, 6:00 PM CT 67% |
| Sat, Oct 10 | at | 10–5 | Oct 10, 3:00 PM CT 42% |
| Tue, Oct 13 | vs. | 5–12 | Oct 13, 6:00 PM CT 95% |
| Sat, Oct 17 | vs. | 9–9 | Oct 17, 3:00 PM CT 68% |
| Fri, Oct 23 | vs. | 9–9 | Oct 23, 5:00 PM CT 77% |
| Sat, Oct 24 | vs. | 15–2 | Oct 24, 3:00 PM CT 26% |
| Tue, Oct 27 | at | 8–6 | Oct 27, 6:00 PM CT 51% |
| Fri, Oct 30 | at | 11–2 | Oct 30, 6:00 PM CT 18% |
| Sat, Oct 31 | at | 4–10 | Oct 31, 3:00 PM CT 80% |
| Fri, Nov 6 | vs. | 10–5 | Nov 6, 5:00 PM CT 54% |
| Sat, Nov 7 | vs. | 9–8 | Nov 7, 3:00 PM CT 78% |
| Tue, Nov 10 | at | 14–1 | Nov 10, 6:00 PM CT 26% |
| Thu, Nov 12 | at | 9–9 | Nov 12, 5:00 PM CT 56% |