Matchup · Played Sat, Aug 29
Already this season
| Date | Match | Angelo St. result |
|---|---|---|
| Sat, Aug 29 | vs. CSU Pueblo | W 3–0 25-20, 25-11, 25-21 |
If they played again
From the power rating, at a neutral site. Angelo St. is expected to win 55.8% of rallies.
93%
Angelo St. wins · power rank 12
3–0 51%3–1 31%3–2 12%
7%
CSU Pueblo wins · power rank 101
3–0 1%3–1 2%3–2 4%
Where the match is won
Each team's strength set against the other's matching skill. Full season, ranked nationally.
Angelo St. on offense
Angelo St. attack vs. CSU Pueblo defense
Angelo St. hitting %.261 · 25th
CSU Pueblo opp. hitting % allowed.180 · 137th
Edge: Angelo St.
Angelo St. serve vs. CSU Pueblo passing
Angelo St. aces per set1.98 · 59th
CSU Pueblo reception error %8.2% · 128th
Slight edge: Angelo St.
Angelo St. siding out vs. CSU Pueblo serving
Angelo St. sideout %64.6% · 6th
CSU Pueblo point-scoring %45.5% · 129th
Edge: Angelo St.
CSU Pueblo on offense
CSU Pueblo attack vs. Angelo St. defense
CSU Pueblo hitting %.197 · 114th
Angelo St. opp. hitting % allowed.148 · 54th
Slight edge: Angelo St.
CSU Pueblo serve vs. Angelo St. passing
CSU Pueblo aces per set1.09 · 277th
Angelo St. reception error %5.1% · 7th
Edge: Angelo St.
CSU Pueblo siding out vs. Angelo St. serving
CSU Pueblo sideout %55.0% · 149th
Angelo St. point-scoring %47.7% · 59th
Edge: Angelo St.
What each team does well
Angelo St.
What they do well
- Sideout %64.6% · 6th in D2
- Reception error %5.1% · 7th in D2
- Kills per set13.98 · 14th in D2
- Assists per set12.85 · 19th in D2
Where they can be pushed
- Service errors per set2.44 · 224th in D2
CSU Pueblo
What they do well
- Service errors per set1.00 · 3rd in D2
- Blocks per set2.60 · 5th in D2
Where they can be pushed
- Aces per set1.09 · 277th in D2
- Assists per set10.11 · 198th in D2
- Kills per set11.26 · 188th in D2
Side by side
Full season, ranked nationally. The bar shows how much of the field each team is better than; the tick is the median.
Angelo St.CSU Pueblo
Against good teams and late in sets
| Angelo St. | CSU Pueblo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power rank | 12 | 101 |
| Schedule strength rank | 60 | 87 |
| Record vs. top 50 | 1–1 | 0–2 |
| Hitting % vs. top 50 | .236 | .118 |
| Opponents hit vs. top 50 | .260 | .282 |
| Rallies won at 20–20 or later | 53.0% 151 | 48.3% 178 |
Players to watch
Each team's leader in every category (regulars only: half of the team's sets). Full season, ranked nationally.
Angelo St.CSU Pueblo
Kills per set
Madi Parrish OH
2.76 · 160 kills · 243rd in D2 · 16th in LSC
Lilly Zwart OH
2.88 · 187 kills · 195th in D2
Hitting %
Sydney Thornton MB
.323 · 122–30–285 · 114th in D2 · 7th in LSC
Finja Schul MB
.310 · 132–47–274 · 144th in D2
Assists per set
Gabi Ashcraft S
5.51 · 270 assists · 169th in D2 · 10th in LSC
Madison Gardner S
4.20 · 210 assists · 285th in D2
Aces per set
Madi Parrish OH
0.40 · 23 aces · 182nd in D2 · 6th in LSC
Madison Gardner S
0.28 · 14 aces · 559th in D2
Blocks per set
Sydney Thornton MB
0.80 · 44 blocks · 210th in D2 · 16th in LSC
Finja Schul MB
1.17 · 76 blocks · 20th in D2
Digs per set
Allie Duitsman DS
3.84 · 223 digs · 138th in D2 · 8th in LSC
Chinaru Pao DS
4.05 · 263 digs · 121st in D2
Points per set
Madi Parrish OH
3.29 · 191 points · 206th in D2 · 14th in LSC
Lilly Zwart OH
3.28 · 213.5 points · 211th in D2
Common opponents
| Opponent | Angelo St. | CSU Pueblo |
|---|---|---|
| W 3–0 25-18, 25-14, 25-8 | W 3–2 20-25, 25-12, 23-25, 25-15, 15-13 | |
| W 3–0 25-18, 25-12, 25-18 | L 1–3 19-25, 25-19, 17-25, 21-25 | |
| W 3–1 21-25, 25-17, 25-18, 26-24 | L 2–3 25-13, 11-25, 20-25, 25-19, 9-15 | |
| W 3–1 18-25, 25-18, 25-10, 25-22 | W 3–2 21-25, 21-25, 25-22, 25-23, 15-13 |
CSU Pueblo roster
| 1 | Delanna Harper | L/DS | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 0.33 |
| 2 | Emma Luce | OH | 49 | 81 | 282 | 1.65 | .110 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.49 | 0.63 | 1.95 |
| 3 | Finja Schul | MB | 65 | 132 | 274 | 2.03 | .310 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 1.1720th D2 | 0.66 | 2.90 |
| 4 | Grace Helzer | OH | 55 | 48 | 178 | 0.87 | .140 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.56 | 0.45 | 1.19 |
| 5 | Lilly Zwart | OH | 65 | 187 | 548 | 2.88 | .246 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 0.46 | 3.28 |
| 6 | Kacee Garcia | DS | 65 | 2 | 14 | 0.03 | .071 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 1.66 | 0.11 |
| 7 | Elena Stankovic | S | 16 | 9 | 26 | 0.56 | .231 | 6.25 | 0.25 | 0.44 | 2.31 | 1.06 |
| 8 | Nicole Monge | DS | 55 | 0 | 3 | 0.00 | .000 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 1.73 | 0.16 |
| 9 | Brianna Pino | OH | 61 | 131 | 408 | 2.15 | .167 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.34 | 1.23 | 2.37 |
| 10 | Andi Nothdurft | MB | 65 | 92 | 235 | 1.42 | .217 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 1.1721st D2 | 0.14 | 2.08 |
| 12 | Natalie Mobley | OPP | 23 | 24 | 84 | 1.04 | .119 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.57 | 0.30 | 1.35 |
| 13 | Madison Gardner | S | 50 | 8 | 23 | 0.16 | .261 | 4.20 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 0.44 |
| 14 | Kendall Schmitz | S | 56 | 12 | 45 | 0.21 | .200 | 4.20 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 0.39 |
| 15 | Chinaru Pao | DS | 65 | 6 | 53 | 0.09 | .094 | 0.89 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 4.05 | 0.28 |
| 17 | Kathryn Scholl | OPP | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | -.400 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 19 | Lola King | L | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.13 |
| 21 | Brooke Logue | S | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | .000 | 1.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.25 |
CSU Pueblo schedule
| Date | Opponent | Opp. record | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fri, Aug 28 | at | 7–11 | W 3–2 20-25, 25-12, 23-25, 25-15, 15-13 |
| Fri, Aug 28 | at | 10–6 | L 2–3 25-13, 11-25, 20-25, 25-19, 9-15 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | vs. | 5–6 | L 0–3 14-25, 19-25, 15-25 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | at | 15–1 | L 0–3 20-25, 11-25, 21-25 |
| Wed, Sep 2 | vs. | 7–9 | W 3–2 21-25, 21-25, 25-22, 25-23, 15-13 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | vs. | 14–1 | L 0–3 21-25, 16-25, 19-25 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | vs. | 4–8 | W 3–1 25-22, 30-28, 18-25, 25-22 |
| Sat, Sep 5 | vs. | 9–8 | L 2–3 25-19, 25-11, 25-27, 23-25, 13-15 |
| Sat, Sep 5 | vs. | 9–6 | L 1–3 19-25, 25-19, 17-25, 21-25 |
| Fri, Sep 11 | at | 1–14 | W 3–0 25-17, 25-16, 29-27 |
| Sat, Sep 12 | at | 7–7 | W 3–2 22-25, 25-19, 22-25, 25-14, 15-8 |
| Fri, Sep 18 | vs. | 12–2 | L 2–3 25-22, 30-28, 18-25, 16-25, 11-15 |
| Sat, Sep 19 | vs. | 6–8 | W 3–0 25-19, 25-19, 25-20 |
| Tue, Sep 22 | vs. | 1–14 | W 3–0 25-15, 25-18, 25-11 |
| Sat, Sep 26 | at | 8–6 | W 3–2 22-25, 25-18, 21-25, 25-20, 15-13 |
| Tue, Sep 29 | at | 6–7 | L 1–3 22-25, 25-21, 23-25, 25-27 |
| Sat, Oct 3 | at | 11–3 | Oct 3, 6:00 PM CT 18% |
| Fri, Oct 9 | vs. | 2–13 | Oct 9, 7:00 PM CT 88% |
| Sat, Oct 10 | vs. | 11–3 | Oct 10, 7:00 PM CT 6% |
| Fri, Oct 16 | vs. | 8–6 | Oct 16, 7:00 PM CT 41% |
| Sat, Oct 17 | vs. | 8–6 | Oct 17, 8:00 PM CT 33% |
| Fri, Oct 23 | at | 8–6 | Oct 23, 7:00 PM CT 30% |
| Sat, Oct 24 | at | 8–6 | Oct 24, 5:00 PM CT 23% |
| Tue, Oct 27 | at | 8–8 | Oct 27, 8:00 PM CT 39% |
| Sat, Oct 31 | vs. | 2–12 | Oct 31, 7:00 PM CT 95% |
| Fri, Nov 6 | at | 7–7 | Nov 6, 7:00 PM CT 58% |
| Sat, Nov 7 | at | 9–6 | Nov 7, 6:00 PM CT 40% |