Great Lakes Valley Conference · 2026 season
Truman State
7–9
Overall
4–3
GLVC
.208
Hitting % · 94th in D2
.227
Opponents hit · 250th in D2
108
Power rank of 281
NCAA tournament chance
Projected Midwest seed 8.0
Projected Midwest seed 8.0
Next · Fri, Oct 9, 6:00 PM CT
vs. William Jewell 2–14
How they play
Ranked against all 281 Division II teams, with the Lone Star rank alongside. The bar shows how much of the field they're better than; the tick marks the median.
What they do well
- Digs per set17.24 · 27th in D2
- Assists per set11.97 · 71st in D2
- Service errors per set1.80 · 82nd in D2
Where they can be pushed
- Opponent hitting %.227 · 250th in D2
- Aces per set1.49 · 200th in D2
- Reception error %9.2% · 186th in D2
Players
Full season. Ranks show the national top 100. Ranked players have played 75% of their team's sets (hitting % also needs 3 attempts per team set).
| 2 | Avery Poppe | OH | 59 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | .000 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 0.14 |
| 3 | Ella Diercks | OH | 16 | 16 | 60 | 1.00 | .083 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| 4 | Tori Creason | S | 59 | 28 | 111 | 0.47 | .171 | 10.3115th D2 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 3.19 | 0.97 |
| 5 | Kendra Shimon | OH | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.45 | 0.00 |
| 7 | Addy Janssen | L/DS | 59 | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | .000 | 0.86 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 4.8834th D2 | 0.18 |
| 8 | Adalyn Galbraith | MB | 37 | 21 | 81 | 0.57 | .074 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.22 | 1.05 |
| 9 | Lily Porter | OH | 41 | 84 | 275 | 2.05 | .189 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.41 | 0.63 | 2.30 |
| 13 | Jessie Julius | OH | 59 | 150 | 532 | 2.54 | .152 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 2.83 | 2.84 |
| 14 | Autumn Erickson | MB | 59 | 151 | 345 | 2.56 | .33981st D2 | 0.12 | 0.37 | 0.86 | 0.78 | 3.42 |
| 15 | Skylar Holler | S | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | -1.000 | 1.08 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.08 |
| 16 | Hannah Hosty | MB | 44 | 61 | 166 | 1.39 | .205 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.55 | 0.16 | 1.66 |
| 17 | Alanna Orton | MB | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 19 | Elise Gibson | OH | 31 | 37 | 104 | 1.19 | .240 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.42 | 1.27 |
| 23 | Laci Neece | OH | 59 | 200 | 580 | 3.3969th D2 | .229 | 0.17 | 0.27 | 0.32 | 2.39 | 3.8471st D2 |
Pressure and runs
Full season. Built from NCAA play-by-play.
Late in sets (20–20 or later)
- Rallies won46.1% of 180
- Sideout %54.6% · all rallies 55.1%
- Point-scoring %36.1% · all rallies 43.8%
- Late kills–errorsErickson 12–2 · Neece 11–2 · Porter 9–0 · Julius 13–7 · Gibson 4–0 · Galbraith 2–1 · Hosty 2–1
Runs and comebacks
- Longest run10 straight · 25–9 in set 2 vs. Newman 09/11
- Longest run against8 straight · 13–25 in set 4 vs. Fort Hays St. 08/27
- Sets with a 5-point run19 for · 33 against · of 59
- Comeback setsdown 8, won 25–22 in set 1 vs. Fort Hays St. 08/27
down 6, won 25–22 in set 1 vs. Maryville (MO) 09/11
down 5, won 25–22 in set 4 vs. Regis (CO) 08/29 - Leads lostup 9, lost 22–25 in set 3 vs. Eastern N.M. 08/28
up 7, lost 23–25 in set 2 vs. Maryville (MO) 09/19
up 6, lost 23–25 in set 1 vs. Southwestern Okla. 09/03
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Opp. record | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thu, Aug 27 | at | 14–6 | L 1–3 25-22, 22-25, 20-25, 13-25 |
| Fri, Aug 28 | vs. | 10–8 | L 0–3 25-27, 19-25, 18-25 |
| Fri, Aug 28 | at | 6–11 | L 1–3 18-25, 16-25, 25-22, 24-26 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | at | 2–15 | W 3–2 25-27, 25-19, 25-16, 22-25, 15-13 |
| Wed, Sep 2 | at | 12–6 | L 0–3 21-25, 22-25, 19-25 |
| Thu, Sep 3 | at | 12–8 | L 1–3 23-25, 25-23, 21-25, 22-25 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | vs. | 11–9 | L 0–3 16-25, 15-25, 18-25 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | at | 6–11 | W 3–2 28-30, 16-25, 25-18, 25-14, 17-15 |
| Fri, Sep 11 | vs. | 6–14 | W 3–0 25-22, 25-9, 25-21 |
| Fri, Sep 11 | vs. | 8–9 | W 3–0 25-22, 25-23, 27-25 |
| Fri, Sep 18 | at | 8–8 | W 3–0 25-14, 25-18, 25-23 |
| Sat, Sep 19 | at | 8–9 | L 1–3 20-25, 25-27, 25-20, 19-25 |
| Fri, Sep 25 | vs. | 16–2 | W 3–2 25-19, 25-15, 22-25, 23-25, 15-13 |
| Sat, Sep 26 | vs. | 12–6 | L 0–3 19-25, 17-25, 17-25 |
| Fri, Oct 2 | at | 11–5 | L 1–3 22-25, 25-19, 19-25, 21-25 |
| Sat, Oct 3 | at | 2–14 | W 3–0 25-15, 25-22, 25-18 |
| Fri, Oct 9 | vs. | 2–14 | Oct 9, 6:00 PM CT 90% |
| Sat, Oct 10 | vs. | 11–5 | Oct 10, 3:00 PM CT 28% |
| Mon, Oct 19 | at | 8–9 | Oct 19, 3:00 PM CT 46% |
| Fri, Oct 23 | at | 12–4 | Oct 23, 6:00 PM CT 23% |
| Sat, Oct 24 | at | 11–6 | Oct 24, 3:00 PM CT 55% |
| Thu, Oct 29 | vs. | 4–12 | Oct 29, 6:00 PM CT 89% |
| Sat, Oct 31 | vs. | 11–7 | Oct 31, 3:00 PM CT 73% |
| Sat, Nov 7 | at | 6–9 | Nov 7, 3:00 PM CT 72% |