Prediction
From the power rating, at UT Permian Basin. Angelo St. is expected to win 55.2% of rallies.
Where the match is won
Each team's strength set against the other's matching skill. Full season, ranked nationally.
Angelo St. on offense
UT Permian Basin on offense
Each team's strength set against the other's matching skill. Lone Star matches only, ranked within the LSC.
Angelo St. on offense
UT Permian Basin on offense
What each team does well
Angelo St.
What they do well
- Sideout %64.6% · 6th in D2
- Reception error %5.1% · 7th in D2
- Kills per set13.98 · 14th in D2
- Assists per set12.85 · 19th in D2
Where they can be pushed
- Service errors per set2.44 · 225th in D2
UT Permian Basin
What they do well
- Digs per set17.67 · 16th in D2
- Service errors per set1.67 · 50th in D2
- Opponent hitting %.162 · 75th in D2
Where they can be pushed
- Aces per set1.38 · 239th in D2
- Reception error %9.8% · 207th in D2
Angelo St.
What they do well
- Sideout %67.9% · 1st in LSC play
- Hitting %.278 · 2nd in LSC play
- Kills per set14.03 · 2nd in LSC play
- Assists per set13.03 · 2nd in LSC play
Where they can be pushed
- Service errors per set2.59 · 17th in LSC play
- Blocks per set1.62 · 12th in LSC play
UT Permian Basin
What they do well
- Digs per set18.18 · 1st in LSC play
- Service errors per set1.57 · 2nd in LSC play
Where they can be pushed
- Hitting %.160 · 16th in LSC play
- Aces per set1.11 · 16th in LSC play
- Reception error %10.3% · 16th in LSC play
Side by side
Full season, ranked nationally. The bar shows how much of the field each team is better than; the tick is the median.
Lone Star matches only, ranked within the LSC. The bar shows how much of the field each team is better than; the tick is the median.
Against good teams and late in sets
| Angelo St. | UT Permian Basin | |
|---|---|---|
| Power rank | 11 | 100 |
| Schedule strength rank | 60 | 83 |
| Record vs. top 50 | 1–1 | — |
| Hitting % vs. top 50 | .236 | — |
| Opponents hit vs. top 50 | .260 | — |
| Rallies won at 20–20 or later | 53.0% 151 | 50.6% 156 |
| Angelo St. | UT Permian Basin | |
|---|---|---|
| Power rank | 11 | 100 |
| Schedule strength rank | 60 | 83 |
| Record vs. top 50 | — | — |
| Hitting % vs. top 50 | — | — |
| Opponents hit vs. top 50 | — | — |
| Rallies won at 20–20 or later | 48.5% 68 | 51.8% 112 |
Players to watch
Each team's leader in every category (regulars only: half of the team's sets). Full season, ranked nationally.
Each team's leader in every category (regulars only: half of the team's sets). Lone Star matches only, ranked within the LSC.
Common opponents
| Opponent | Angelo St. | UT Permian Basin |
|---|---|---|
| W 3–0 25-18, 25-14, 25-8 | L 2–3 25-13, 25-22, 23-25, 23-25, 15-17 | |
| W 3–0 25-18, 25-12, 25-18 | W 3–0 25-19, 25-14, 25-18 | |
| W 3–1 21-25, 25-17, 25-18, 26-24 | W 3–0 31-29, 25-21, 25-17 | |
| W 3–0 25-20, 25-11, 25-21 | W 3–0 25-14, 25-19, 25-15 | |
| W 3–2 22-25, 31-33, 25-15, 25-22, 15-12 | L 1–3 23-25, 11-25, 25-19, 13-25 | |
| W 3–1 25-20, 23-25, 25-9, 25-18 | W 3–2 16-25, 25-23, 25-23, 21-25, 17-15 L 0–3 19-25, 16-25, 19-25 | |
| W 3–1 27-29, 25-16, 25-14, 25-18 | L 2–3 25-21, 23-25, 26-24, 21-25, 11-15 | |
| W 3–2 25-13, 25-20, 19-25, 18-25, 15-8 | L 2–3 25-17, 23-25, 24-26, 25-15, 12-15 |
UT Permian Basin roster
| 1 | Makenna Grimes | OH | 42 | 86 | 226 | 2.05 | .217 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.67 | 2.19 |
| 2 | Kyndall Torres | L/DS | 42 | 1 | 6 | 0.02 | .000 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.45 | 0.02 |
| 3 | Bentleigh Bundy | OH | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | -1.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | Ana Romero | L/DS | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | Addison Parks | OH | 13 | 26 | 92 | 2.00 | .120 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.92 | 2.15 |
| 8 | Giselle Orellana | OH | 40 | 58 | 213 | 1.45 | .103 | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.05 | 2.77 | 1.69 |
| 9 | Isabel Rodriguez | L/DS | 40 | 2 | 3 | 0.05 | .667 | 0.55 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 2.48 | 0.10 |
| 10 | Haley Beggs | MB | 6 | 5 | 24 | 0.83 | -.042 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.92 |
| 12 | Precious Johnson | MB | 42 | 52 | 130 | 1.24 | .262 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.83 | 0.21 | 1.82 |
| 13 | Nickilah Whatley | MB | 42 | 75 | 179 | 1.79 | .279 | 0.14 | 0.33 | 0.71 | 1.07 | 2.56 |
| 15 | Sydney Bradley | OH | 40 | 64 | 207 | 1.60 | .130 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 2.00 |
| 17 | Kaitlyn Salgado | OH | 40 | 123 | 376 | 3.08 | .205 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 2.52 | 3.40 |
| 19 | Kierra Freeman | S | 42 | 10 | 39 | 0.24 | .128 | 4.88 | 0.405th LSC | 0.00 | 2.71 | 0.64 |
| 20 | Emma Gonzalez | S | 42 | 10 | 35 | 0.24 | .114 | 4.38 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 0.40 |
| 1 | Makenna Grimes | OH | 28 | 64 | 165 | 2.29 | .218 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.75 | 2.48 |
| 2 | Kyndall Torres | L/DS | 28 | 1 | 6 | 0.04 | .000 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.82 | 0.04 |
| 3 | Bentleigh Bundy | OH | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | Addison Parks | OH | 13 | 26 | 92 | 2.00 | .120 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.92 | 2.15 |
| 8 | Giselle Orellana | OH | 26 | 26 | 108 | 1.00 | .065 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 2.81 | 1.15 |
| 9 | Isabel Rodriguez | L/DS | 26 | 1 | 1 | 0.04 | 1.000 | 0.42 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 2.12 | 0.12 |
| 10 | Haley Beggs | MB | 6 | 5 | 24 | 0.83 | -.042 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.92 |
| 12 | Precious Johnson | MB | 28 | 36 | 94 | 1.29 | .266 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.8610th LSC | 0.14 | 1.88 |
| 13 | Nickilah Whatley | MB | 28 | 52 | 127 | 1.86 | .268 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.61 | 1.25 | 2.43 |
| 15 | Sydney Bradley | OH | 26 | 44 | 151 | 1.69 | .106 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.58 | 0.85 | 2.00 |
| 17 | Kaitlyn Salgado | OH | 26 | 72 | 250 | 2.77 | .152 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 2.38 | 3.13 |
| 19 | Kierra Freeman | S | 28 | 6 | 24 | 0.21 | .125 | 5.11 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 0.43 |
| 20 | Emma Gonzalez | S | 28 | 5 | 23 | 0.18 | .000 | 4.29 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 2.43 | 0.39 |
UT Permian Basin schedule
| Date | Opponent | Opp. record | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fri, Aug 28 | at | 9–6 | W 3–0 25-19, 25-14, 25-18 |
| Fri, Aug 28 | at | 10–6 | W 3–0 31-29, 25-21, 25-17 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | at | 8–8 | W 3–0 25-14, 25-19, 25-15 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | at | 6–11 | L 2–3 25-13, 25-22, 23-25, 23-25, 15-17 |
| Thu, Sep 10 | vs. | 7–6 | W 3–0 33-31, 28-26, 25-21 |
| Sat, Sep 12 | vs. | 7–8 | W 3–2 16-25, 25-23, 25-23, 21-25, 17-15 |
| Fri, Sep 18 | at | 7–8 | L 0–3 19-25, 16-25, 19-25 |
| Sat, Sep 19 | at | 9–6 | L 1–3 23-25, 11-25, 25-19, 13-25 |
| Fri, Sep 25 | vs. | 1–14 | L 2–3 25-17, 23-25, 24-26, 25-15, 12-15 |
| Sat, Sep 26 | vs. | 8–7 | L 2–3 25-21, 23-25, 26-24, 21-25, 11-15 |
| Tue, Sep 29 | vs. | 9–7 | L 0–3 23-25, 13-25, 19-25 |
| Fri, Oct 2 | at | 12–2 | Oct 2, 6:00 PM CT 18% |
| Sat, Oct 3 | at | 7–6 | Oct 3, 2:00 PM CT 36% |
| Sat, Oct 10 | vs. | 15–1 | Oct 10, 2:00 PM CT 9% |
| Fri, Oct 16 | vs. | 11–2 | Oct 16, 6:00 PM CT 21% |
| Sat, Oct 17 | vs. | 4–10 | Oct 17, 1:00 PM CT 64% |
| Tue, Oct 20 | vs. | 0–15 | Oct 20, 6:00 PM CT 99% |
| Fri, Oct 23 | at | 7–9 | Oct 23, 6:00 PM CT 23% |
| Sat, Oct 24 | at | 5–10 | Oct 24, 2:00 PM CT 76% |
| Fri, Oct 30 | vs. | 7–8 | Oct 30, 6:00 PM CT 65% |
| Sat, Oct 31 | vs. | 7–8 | Oct 31, 1:00 PM CT 64% |
| Fri, Nov 6 | at | 7–9 | Nov 6, 6:00 PM CT 72% |
| Sat, Nov 7 | at | 12–4 | Nov 7, 2:00 PM CT 37% |