Matchup · Played Fri, Oct 2
Already this season
| Date | Match | Lake Superior St. result |
|---|---|---|
| Fri, Oct 2 | at Michigan Tech | L 0–3 19-25, 12-25, 20-25 |
If they played again
From the power rating, at a neutral site. Lake Superior St. is expected to win 41.3% of rallies.
1%
Lake Superior St. wins · power rank 211
3–0 0%3–1 0%3–2 1%
99%
Michigan Tech wins · power rank 38
3–0 72%3–1 23%3–2 4%
Where the match is won
Each team's strength set against the other's matching skill. Full season, ranked nationally.
Lake Superior St. on offense
Lake Superior St. attack vs. Michigan Tech defense
Lake Superior St. hitting %.117 · 253rd
Michigan Tech opp. hitting % allowed.218 · 236th
Even
Lake Superior St. serve vs. Michigan Tech passing
Lake Superior St. aces per set1.31 · 250th
Michigan Tech reception error %6.4% · 30th
Edge: Michigan Tech
Lake Superior St. siding out vs. Michigan Tech serving
Lake Superior St. sideout %49.6% · 252nd
Michigan Tech point-scoring %42.5% · 217th
Slight edge: Michigan Tech
Michigan Tech on offense
Michigan Tech attack vs. Lake Superior St. defense
Michigan Tech hitting %.227 · 58th
Lake Superior St. opp. hitting % allowed.206 · 208th
Edge: Michigan Tech
Michigan Tech serve vs. Lake Superior St. passing
Michigan Tech aces per set1.52 · 188th
Lake Superior St. reception error %10.9% · 245th
Slight edge: Michigan Tech
Michigan Tech siding out vs. Lake Superior St. serving
Michigan Tech sideout %59.0% · 51st
Lake Superior St. point-scoring %42.4% · 220th
Edge: Michigan Tech
What each team does well
Lake Superior St.
What they do well
Nothing in the top 30% of D2 yet.
Where they can be pushed
- Kills per set9.04 · 272nd in D2
- Assists per set8.40 · 270th in D2
- Hitting %.117 · 253rd in D2
Michigan Tech
What they do well
- Reception error %6.4% · 30th in D2
- Sideout %59.0% · 51st in D2
- Hitting %.227 · 58th in D2
- Service errors per set1.70 · 61st in D2
Where they can be pushed
- Opponent hitting %.218 · 236th in D2
- Blocks per set1.43 · 226th in D2
- Point-scoring %42.5% · 217th in D2
Side by side
Full season, ranked nationally. The bar shows how much of the field each team is better than; the tick is the median.
Lake Superior St.Michigan Tech
Against good teams and late in sets
| Lake Superior St. | Michigan Tech | |
|---|---|---|
| Power rank | 211 | 38 |
| Schedule strength rank | 131 | 27 |
| Record vs. top 50 | 0–6 | 0–4 |
| Hitting % vs. top 50 | .075 | .188 |
| Opponents hit vs. top 50 | .319 | .247 |
| Rallies won at 20–20 or later | 45.7% 81 | 50.0% 196 |
Players to watch
Each team's leader in every category (regulars only: half of the team's sets). Full season, ranked nationally.
Lake Superior St.Michigan Tech
Kills per set
Elisa Rizzoli OH
2.63 · 126 kills · 296th in D2
Rachel Zurek OH
4.19 · 264 kills · 8th in D2
Hitting %
Morgan Deming MB
.209 · 61–22–187 · 526th in D2
Paige Wagner MB
.278 · 133–47–309 · 225th in D2
Assists per set
Azra Bilgicer S
4.51 · 158 assists
Madelynn Kreider S
10.10 · 636 assists · 20th in D2
Aces per set
Amilia Ashcroft L/DS
0.31 · 10 aces
Kayla Heinonen OH
0.40 · 25 aces · 158th in D2
Blocks per set
Morgan Deming MB
0.84 · 46 blocks · 178th in D2
Tricia Kennedy MB
0.75 · 47 blocks · 267th in D2
Digs per set
Elisa Rizzoli OH
3.63 · 174 digs · 165th in D2
Keeley Nellis L
4.03 · 254 digs · 125th in D2
Points per set
Elisa Rizzoli OH
3.02 · 145 points · 314th in D2
Rachel Zurek OH
4.40 · 277.5 points · 23rd in D2
Common opponents
| Opponent | Lake Superior St. | Michigan Tech |
|---|---|---|
| L 0–3 14-25, 15-25, 18-25 | L 2–3 22-25, 25-19, 25-21, 20-25, 15-17 | |
| L 1–3 15-25, 25-27, 25-23, 21-25 | W 3–1 25-18, 23-25, 25-20, 25-22 | |
| L 2–3 25-15, 17-25, 18-25, 25-19, 12-15 | W 3–0 25-17, 26-24, 26-24 | |
| L 0–3 10-25, 10-25, 14-25 | L 0–3 19-25, 16-25, 18-25 | |
| L 0–3 21-25, 14-25, 20-25 | L 2–3 18-25, 25-22, 21-25, 25-22, 10-15 |
Lake Superior St. roster
| 1 | Amilia Ashcroft | L/DS | 32 | 1 | 7 | 0.03 | .143 | 0.13 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 0.34 |
| 2 | Ava Tarsi | S | 40 | 1 | 20 | 0.03 | .050 | 3.30 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 1.45 | 0.23 |
| 4 | Giselle Wiitanen | MB | 20 | 3 | 20 | 0.15 | -.100 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.20 | 0.17 |
| 6 | Shea Berisoff | OPP | 53 | 84 | 311 | 1.58 | .106 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.34 | 0.43 | 1.80 |
| 7 | Mia Garcia | L/DS | 32 | 1 | 13 | 0.03 | .000 | 0.41 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 2.47 | 0.28 |
| 8 | Caitlyn Matelski | OPP | 26 | 28 | 113 | 1.08 | .150 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 1.25 |
| 9 | Avery Headworth | S | 38 | 3 | 22 | 0.08 | .136 | 2.50 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.76 | 0.29 |
| 11 | Jade Peterson | MB | 40 | 12 | 58 | 0.30 | .034 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0.23 | 0.61 |
| 12 | Zaira Giovanna Missipo | OH | 23 | 19 | 62 | 0.83 | .048 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 1.13 | 0.96 |
| 13 | Morgan Deming | MB | 55 | 61 | 187 | 1.11 | .209 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.84 | 0.42 | 1.67 |
| 14 | Rachel Steele | OPP | 48 | 76 | 305 | 1.58 | .102 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.46 | 1.21 | 1.96 |
| 17 | Azra Bilgicer | S | 35 | 17 | 76 | 0.49 | .132 | 4.51 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 1.97 | 0.66 |
| 18 | Addison Marisko | MB | 16 | 5 | 18 | 0.31 | .000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.38 |
| 19 | Elisa Rizzoli | OH | 48 | 126 | 395 | 2.63 | .180 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 3.63 | 3.02 |
| 21 | Ava Wells | L/DS | 45 | 1 | 22 | 0.02 | -.045 | 0.58 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 2.38 | 0.11 |
| 22 | Giovanna Waters | OH | 44 | 59 | 264 | 1.34 | .053 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 2.16 | 1.59 |
Michigan Tech roster
| 1 | Madelyn Elsen | L/DS | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.12 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 2.12 | 0.35 |
| 2 | Ella Maxwell | S | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 3 | Madelyn Torola | OH | 20 | 40 | 118 | 2.00 | .178 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 0.60 | 2.20 |
| 4 | Kayla Heinonen | OH | 63 | 152 | 486 | 2.41 | .175 | 0.19 | 0.40 | 0.22 | 2.52 | 2.94 |
| 5 | Brynn Erickson | L/DS | 43 | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | .000 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 0.12 |
| 6 | Natalie Leach | L/DS | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.03 |
| 7 | Kate Loch | OH | 9 | 2 | 9 | 0.22 | .000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| 8 | Reagan Lesley | OH | 32 | 44 | 130 | 1.38 | .092 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.72 | 1.45 |
| 10 | Paige Wagner | MB | 63 | 133 | 309 | 2.11 | .278 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 2.62 |
| 11 | Laney Knaack | MB | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | -1.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 12 | Jacqueline Yancy | OH | 18 | 34 | 106 | 1.89 | .226 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.39 | 0.33 | 2.11 |
| 13 | Mia Hahn | OH | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 14 | Keeley Nellis | L/DS | 63 | 3 | 10 | 0.05 | -.100 | 0.83 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 4.03 | 0.17 |
| 15 | Amelia Albers | L/DS | 63 | 1 | 10 | 0.02 | -.100 | 0.22 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 2.43 | 0.41 |
| 16 | Madelynn Kreider | S | 63 | 47 | 149 | 0.75 | .262 | 10.1020th D2 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 2.97 | 1.06 |
| 18 | Rachel Zurek | OH | 63 | 264 | 661 | 4.198th D2 | .274 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.43 | 4.4023rd D2 |
| 20 | Tricia Kennedy | MB | 63 | 98 | 264 | 1.56 | .254 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.16 | 2.06 |
Michigan Tech schedule
| Date | Opponent | Opp. record | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thu, Aug 27 | vs. | 16–1 | L 2–3 25-21, 20-25, 17-25, 25-17, 23-25 |
| Fri, Aug 28 | at | 12–5 | L 2–3 25-19, 17-25, 23-25, 25-19, 11-15 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | at | 6–8 | W 3–0 25-16, 25-23, 25-22 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | vs. | 2–13 | W 3–0 25-21, 25-18, 25-17 |
| Thu, Sep 3 | at | 10–6 | L 2–3 25-27, 13-25, 25-23, 25-21, 10-15 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | vs. | 9–8 | W 3–2 25-15, 18-25, 16-25, 29-27, 15-8 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | vs. | 12–4 | L 2–3 22-25, 25-19, 25-21, 20-25, 15-17 |
| Sat, Sep 5 | vs. | 10–8 | W 3–0 25-17, 25-20, 26-24 |
| Fri, Sep 11 | at | 11–4 | L 2–3 20-25, 25-22, 25-18, 21-25, 10-15 |
| Sat, Sep 12 | at | 12–6 | W 3–1 25-18, 23-25, 25-20, 25-22 |
| Fri, Sep 18 | vs. | 16–0 | L 0–3 19-25, 16-25, 18-25 |
| Sat, Sep 19 | vs. | 11–4 | W 3–0 30-28, 25-21, 25-23 |
| Tue, Sep 22 | at | 8–8 | L 2–3 18-25, 25-22, 21-25, 25-22, 10-15 |
| Fri, Sep 25 | at | 7–9 | W 3–0 25-17, 26-24, 26-24 |
| Fri, Oct 2 | vs. | 3–13 | W 3–0 25-19, 25-12, 25-20 |
| Sat, Oct 3 | vs. | 1–14 | W 3–0 25-21, 25-15, 25-21 |
| Fri, Oct 9 | at | 11–5 | Oct 9, 6:00 PM CT 44% |
| Sat, Oct 10 | at | 1–14 | Oct 10, 1:00 PM CT 90% |
| Fri, Oct 23 | at | 14–3 | Oct 23, 5:00 PM CT 21% |
| Sat, Oct 24 | at | 5–10 | Oct 24, 2:00 PM CT 98% |
| Fri, Oct 30 | vs. | 7–9 | Oct 30, 5:00 PM CT 79% |
| Sat, Oct 31 | vs. | 14–3 | Oct 31, 1:00 PM CT 31% |
| Tue, Nov 3 | vs. | 8–8 | Nov 3, 5:00 PM CT 72% |
| Sat, Nov 7 | vs. | 5–10 | Nov 7, 2:00 PM CT 99% |
Want this as a game-day scouting report? See a sample ›
Lake Superior St. schedule
| Date | Opponent | Opp. record | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thu, Aug 27 | at | 12–4 | L 0–3 14-25, 15-25, 18-25 |
| Fri, Aug 28 | at | 13–4 | L 1–3 10-25, 12-25, 25-23, 15-25 |
| Fri, Aug 28 | at | 3–14 | L 2–3 21-25, 19-25, 25-17, 25-20, 14-16 |
| Sat, Aug 29 | at | 7–9 | L 1–3 25-17, 17-25, 22-25, 20-25 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | at | 5–10 | W 3–0 25-15, 25-22, 25-17 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | at | 2–18 | W 3–0 25-22, 25-16, 25-19 |
| Sat, Sep 5 | vs. | 13–9 | W 3–0 25-16, 25-22, 25-16 |
| Sat, Sep 5 | at | 6–9 | L 0–3 18-25, 21-25, 15-25 |
| Fri, Sep 11 | at | 14–3 | L 0–3 14-25, 11-25, 6-25 |
| Sat, Sep 12 | at | 11–5 | L 0–3 13-25, 12-25, 18-25 |
| Fri, Sep 18 | vs. | 12–6 | L 1–3 15-25, 25-27, 25-23, 21-25 |
| Sat, Sep 19 | vs. | 7–9 | L 2–3 25-15, 17-25, 18-25, 25-19, 12-15 |
| Fri, Sep 25 | vs. | 11–5 | L 0–3 8-25, 23-25, 15-25 |
| Sat, Sep 26 | at | 16–0 | L 0–3 10-25, 10-25, 14-25 |
| Fri, Oct 2 | at | 9–7 | L 0–3 19-25, 12-25, 20-25 |
| Sat, Oct 3 | vs. | 8–8 | L 0–3 21-25, 14-25, 20-25 |
| Fri, Oct 9 | at | 1–14 | Oct 9, 5:00 PM CT 17% |
| Sat, Oct 10 | at | 5–10 | Oct 10, 2:00 PM CT 42% |
| Fri, Oct 23 | vs. | 1–14 | Oct 23, 11:00 AM CT 25% |
| Sat, Oct 24 | vs. | 16–0 | Oct 24, 1:00 PM CT 1% |
| Fri, Oct 30 | at | 11–4 | Oct 30, 5:00 PM CT 2% |
| Sat, Oct 31 | at | 12–6 | Oct 31, 3:00 PM CT 2% |
| Fri, Nov 6 | vs. | 5–10 | Nov 6, 1:00 PM CT 54% |
| Sat, Nov 7 | vs. | 11–4 | Nov 7, 3:00 PM CT 4% |